I justifiably had my wrist slapped for submitting a handwritten family tree to an online forum recently. "We just can't read a single thing!" "How much better would your enquiry be if all the inter-connections were shown through paragraphed text rather than your naughty diagram!" So wrote the helpful chatty folk.
(Not one of whom could solve the puzzle.)
Well the lovely picture above is just a purchase today consolidating my view that handwriting is best.
I've earlier shown how handwritten letters do better on the whole than the typewritten variety when contacting new cousins.
Last week I photographed the beautiful linked trees I'd drawn some years back, which had enabled me to reflect on recent discoveries and present the data in a clear way for a new audience.
The problem was the balance between completeness and a crowding of facts. How could the tree remain readable without editing out half the people? Also, how can I include enough of the story without overwhelming the reader?
There are clever circular charts which can reduce everything you know to half a page, stripping in my opinion lots of the mystique away and rendering your research worthy of just a casual glance.
The glance that Maggie Smith's character would have given in Downton Abbey as she viewed your seize-quartiers (genealogical credentials) before passing them to a junior nephew and declaring "he fits".
How much more valuable a scruffy pen-portrait laying out the real truths of the family, incorporating insights of wise family members.
Valuable, but unreadable, so I send you this blog instead. Utterly readable but lacking any human touch whatsoever.
(Not one of whom could solve the puzzle.)
Well the lovely picture above is just a purchase today consolidating my view that handwriting is best.
I've earlier shown how handwritten letters do better on the whole than the typewritten variety when contacting new cousins.
Last week I photographed the beautiful linked trees I'd drawn some years back, which had enabled me to reflect on recent discoveries and present the data in a clear way for a new audience.
The problem was the balance between completeness and a crowding of facts. How could the tree remain readable without editing out half the people? Also, how can I include enough of the story without overwhelming the reader?
There are clever circular charts which can reduce everything you know to half a page, stripping in my opinion lots of the mystique away and rendering your research worthy of just a casual glance.
The glance that Maggie Smith's character would have given in Downton Abbey as she viewed your seize-quartiers (genealogical credentials) before passing them to a junior nephew and declaring "he fits".
How much more valuable a scruffy pen-portrait laying out the real truths of the family, incorporating insights of wise family members.
Valuable, but unreadable, so I send you this blog instead. Utterly readable but lacking any human touch whatsoever.