(Not one of whom could solve the puzzle.)
Well the lovely picture above is just a purchase today consolidating my view that handwriting is best.
I've earlier shown how handwritten letters do better on the whole than the typewritten variety when contacting new cousins.
Last week I photographed the beautiful linked trees I'd drawn some years back, which had enabled me to reflect on recent discoveries and present the data in a clear way for a new audience.
The problem was the balance between completeness and a crowding of facts. How could the tree remain readable without editing out half the people? Also, how can I include enough of the story without overwhelming the reader?
There are clever circular charts which can reduce everything you know to half a page, stripping in my opinion lots of the mystique away and rendering your research worthy of just a casual glance.
The glance that Maggie Smith's character would have given in Downton Abbey as she viewed your seize-quartiers (genealogical credentials) before passing them to a junior nephew and declaring "he fits".
How much more valuable a scruffy pen-portrait laying out the real truths of the family, incorporating insights of wise family members.
Valuable, but unreadable, so I send you this blog instead. Utterly readable but lacking any human touch whatsoever.



